Only few ancient tales have ever triggered the human imagination as much as the story of Atlantis (Kosmiczne […] 2019). The idea that over 11 000 years ago an advanced civilization created by gods could have existed on Earth has long fascinated millions of people around the world (Ibid.).
Is the story of Atlantis a historical record?
The story of Atlantis was recorded by a famous Athenian philosopher, Plato (c. 428-348 BC) in his two works, the dialogues of Timaeus (c. 360 BC) and following it, Critias (left incomplete) (“Critias (dialogue)” 2020; “Timaeus (dialogue)” 2020). Although the former work merely includes an introduction to the story of the lost city, the latter gives its far detailed accounts (Ettington 2018:3-21). Nevertheless, the vast majority of scientists today consider the description of Atlantis purely a utopian story invented by the Greek author to present his political views (Kosmiczne […] 2019). Indeed, Plato recounts the story of the mighty Atlantis to show its failure in the face of the ordered society of the Athenians (“Critias (dialogue)” 2020).
On the other side, however, the same scientists must admit that Plato’s description of the legendary city-continent is highly comprehensive and so it does not seem to be solely a made-up philosophical story just for the purpose of moralizing the society. It is enough to mention the accurate geographical location of Atlantis given by the author with all its detailed measurements to consider the question of its existence. Moreover, Plato continuously highlights in his records that the story of Atlantis is true and he even provides his readers with the exact time of its destruction by floods, which is in fact a geologically destructive episode in the Earth history (Hancock 2020).
“[A] tale which, though strange, is certainly true, having been attested by Solon, who was the wisest of the seven sages”.Plato, Timaeus
For some, Atlantis may only be a fiction but it should be taken into account that other legendary cities, such as Troya or Dwarka, had also been once thought as only myths until they were eventually discovered (Kosmiczne […] 2019). As much as all the facts about Atlantis are acknowledged, its phenomenon deserves more academic attention.
From generation to generation
How did Plato hear about the continent having existed thousands of years before he was born? The author refers to Solon’s oral accounts (Kosmiczne […] 2019; Ettington 2018:3-5). Solon was Plato’s ancestor and an Athenian legislator and statesman, who lived two hundred years before the Greek Philosopher, at the turn of the seventh and sixth centuries BC (Kosmiczne […] 2019; Ettington 2018:3-4). After introducing reforms in the state of Athens, Solon travelled to Egypt, where he learned the history of Atlantis from an Egyptian priest (Kosmiczne […] 2019). Plato does not mention the priest’s name, but the famous historian Plutarch (46–120 AD) records in his work, La vita di Solone, that it was Sonchis of Sais (Ibid.). According to Plato, the Egyptian priest unrevealed to Solon the story of Atlantis (Ibid.), which was originally written down on the walls of the temple of Sais (Hancock 2020). The Delta City of Sais is actually the Greek name for the Egyptian city of Sau (Current World Archaeology 2009). Now it is an archaeological site but it used to be a great and old city of the Pharaonic Era (Ibid.). It is mostly known from the records of the Greek historian, Herodotus (484 – c. 425 BC), who enthusiastically describes Sais as a great city, brimming with colossal temples, statues and splendid kings’ tombs (Ibid.). Such a royal city must have preserved ancient records and history.
Why did the Egyptian priest share the story of Atlantis? His reasons are unknown but from Plato’s accounts on Atlantis, contemporary Egypt was one of Atlantis’ colonies and so the Dynastic Egypt must have preserved much information referring to the lost continent (Ettington 2018:4-5). Since Solon’s return to Athens, the story had been passed down from generation to generation until it reached the ears of Plato, who examined it in his youth to finally write it down (Ettington 2018:4; Kosmiczne […] 2019).
Continent, empire, island … and capital city
After the Egyptian accounts, and then Plato’s written records, Atlantis was once an advanced civilization that was destroyed 9,000 years ago (Kosmiczne […] 2019).
“This power came forth out of the Atlantic Ocean, for in those days the Atlantic was navigable; and there was an island situated in front of the straits which are by you called the Pillars of Heracles; the island was larger than Libya and Asia put together, and was the way to other islands, and from these you might pass to the whole of the opposite continent which surrounded the true ocean; for this sea which is within the Straits of Heracles is only a harbour, having a narrow entrance, but that other is a real sea, and the surrounding land may be most truly called a boundless continent. Now in this island of Atlantis there was a great and wonderful empire which had rule over the whole island and several others, and over parts of the continent, and, furthermore, the men of Atlantis had subjected the parts of Libya within the columns of Heracles as far as Egypt, and of Europe as far as Tyrrhenia”.Plato, Timaeus
According to Plato, the legendary land was once located behind the Pillars of Hercules, that is to say, in the Atlantic Ocean, behind Gibraltar (Kosmiczne […] 2019). The name Atlantis itself has a triple implication and simultaneously stands for the capital city, the main island and the great state or even a continent; the capital city was situated on the main island, which was in turn an integrative part of the landmass, peninsulas and islands in the Atlantic Ocean to form the whole empire of Atlantis, not to mention its colonies (Alexander, Rosen 2011; Alexander 2018).
As the story goes, the whole domain of Atlantis, including its numerous provinces, extended in the north towards Gades, which name sounds like the modern city of Cadiz, in southern Spain (Alexander, Rosen 2011).
“To [Atlas’] twin brother, who was born after him, and obtained as his lot the extremity of the island towards the Pillars of Heracles, facing the country which is now called the region of Gades in that part of the world, he gave the name which in the Hellenic language is Eumelus, in the language of the country which is named after him, Gadeirus”.Plato, Critias
The region referred to by Plato as ‘controlled by Atlanteans’, which stands for its dependencies, means the territory of the modern Mediterranean world (Alexander 2018), namely: “Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Malta, Mallorca, Menorca, Ibiza, Sardinia, Corsica, Sicily, southern Spain, southern France, southern Italy” (Ibid.). At that time, the region of other adjacent countries, notably Greece, stayed outside the sphere of Atlantis’ influence (Ibid.). Possibly hence the military actions between the Atlanteans and Athenians broke out.
During the gods’ division of the Earth, the region of Atlantis fell to Poseidon (Kosmiczne […] 2019). Wishing to make Atlantis safe, he surrounded it with concentric ramparts and moats (Ibid.). Then, the Atlanteans built a great city based on these fortifications (Ibid.). On a hill, in the centre of the island, they constructed a royal palace with a Temple of Poseidon inside its walls (Ibid.). Within it, there was a giant golden statue of the god (Ibid.). Apart from it, there were also numerous temples and recreation areas in the city, and a powerful fleet of ships in the port open to the south, into the Ocean (Ibid.). High mountains to the north protected the inhabitants from the frosty winds (Ibid.). Herds of wild and tamed animals grazed in the meadows, among the streams of lakes (Ibid.). Plato in his description states that Atlantis was ruled by five pairs of Poseidon’s twins who were born from a mortal woman (Ibid.) (once again, there is described an intercourse between a deity and a human female; see: Gibbor in the Louvre). Accordingly, Atlantis was divided into ten provinces (Ibid.). Each of Poseidon’s descendant had ruled over them in peace until their human factor prevailed over the divine and pushed the state into collapse (Ibid.).
In search of the legend around the Globe
Despite the fact that Atlantis is regarded as a myth by mainstream historians, independent authors and researchers have been looking for a real source of the legend for centuries, which in a way contributed to the development of various fields of science, such as geography, archaeology or geology, and consequently expanded human knowledge about the formation of continents, the nature of the seabed, or about ancient civilizations in general (Kosmiczne […] 2019).
According to some sources, there have been more than twenty-seven sites studied as potential locations of the circular city of Atlantis (Ettington 2018:23). The Greek islands of Thera and Crete (see: The World Ended When Gods Turned against the Minoans), and an Italian Sardinia and Malta were mentioned, among others (Ettington 2018:23-25; Kosmiczne […] 2019). However, Plato clearly states that the lost city was beyond the Straits of Gibraltar (‘Gates of Hercules’) (Ettington 2018:25; Kosmiczne […] 2019). Thus, Atlantis was also connected with the Canary Islands, Madeira and the Azores (Ettington 2018:25-26; Kosmiczne […] 2019). Some researchers have equally speculated that Atlantis may have actually been an ice-free Antarctica, or it may have been located in the Caribbean (Bermuda, Cuba) or South America, in the Andes (Ettington 2018:26-28; Kosmiczne […] 2019).
 See: Gavin Menzies (2011) The Lost Empire of Atlantis: History’s Greatest Mystery Revealed.
 See: Alberino, T., Quayle, S. (2017) True Legends, Episode 3: Holocaust of Giants. GenSix Productions.
 See: Ignatius L. Donnelly (1882). Atlantis: The Antediluvian World.
 See: Graham Hancock (1996) Fingerprints Of The Gods.
 See: Paul Weinzweig and Pauline Zalitzki’s theory.
 See: Jim Allen (2009). Atlantis: Lost Kingdom of the Andes.
The real Atlantis
Myself, I have also chased down documentaries announcing to disclose the phenomena of Atlantis, but unfortunately, each of them has only finished with another promise that someday the mystery will be revealed, providing that more research is conducted. And here’s the rub! Mainstream Academia is hardly involved in the research dedicated to Atlantis as it considers it just as a moralistic tale, which cannot be found on a map. Even if such studies are undertaken, they are mostly carried out by alternative and independent researchers and authors. Huge budget at their disposal is a must; it is needed not only for the exploration of the subject but also for a dissemination of their theory. This is why some invaluable ideas and conclusions have hardly been ever heard by a larger public. A very similar situation occurred at the beginning of the twenty-first century, regarding another proposed location of Atlantis. This site is known as the Eye of the Sahara and has lately been called by some researchers the real Atlantis.
First, I learnt about the theory in English and I still remember how great impression made on me the sight of the newly proposed location of the legendary island …
The Eye of Africa aka Atlantis
In the English-language part of the Internet, the thesis linking the Eye of the Sahara with the lost continent was more recognizable long after the first decade of the twenty-first century but the first researchers who have connected the Eye of the Sahara with Atlantis documented their theory already in 2011 (Kosmiczne […] 2019). Those were George Alexander and Natalis Rosen (Ibid.). In their research and study trip to the site, they were both amazed at how the Eye of the Sahara resembles the description of Atlantis by Plato (Ibid.). The result of their studies is a self-recorded documentary, entitled Visiting Atlantis. Gateway to a Lost World (2011) (Ibid.). Seven years later, Jimmy from the Bright Insight Youtube channel became passionate about the topic, thanks to which the thesis gained greater popularity among English speaking public (Ibid.). In Poland, this topic was rather unknown and popularized only in 2019 by the Polish-language Youtube channel, Kosmiczne Opowieści (The Cosmic Tales) (Ibid.).
I assume that not all the people in Poland are interested in the subject (as they do not have to be so). However, each time I mention to my acquaintances the site of the Eye of the Sahara and its potential connections to Atlantis, they are surprised that such a structure can be found on Earth at all. But this mysterious formation is, yet only discernible from the above.
Bull’s eye in the plain
As the Eye of the Sahara cannot be seen from the ground level, while one is walking around it, it was then well hidden from the public, also because it lies on the territory, which is not frequently visited by tourists or researchers (Ettington 2018:32; Kosmiczne […] 2019). Only an aerial view of the Eye of the Sahara (aka the Eye of Africa) was able to reveal a vast, crater-like geological structure (Kosmiczne […] 2019; “Richat Structure” 2020). It is located in the Northwest Africa, in the Sahara desert, within the state of Mauritania (Ibid.). Concentrically arranged circles in shades of yellow, brown, grey, together with blue on the edge, resemble the iris of the giant eye, from which the popular name of the formation derives (Kosmiczne […] 2019).
The Eye was also labelled Richât Crater or buttonhole (Ettington 2018:31). Today, the structure is formally known as the Richât or Guelb er Richât (“Richat Structure” 2020).
NASA photographs again reveal a wonder
The Eye was first noticed and depicted in the 1930s and 1940s, only with the help of the first space flights and NASA satellite photographs of the planet, which eventually showed this extraordinary structure in the Sahara desert (Ettington 2018:31-32; Kosmiczne […] 2019). By these means also other mysterious formations on the Earth were exposed and studied. One of the most famous is undoubtedly Ram Setu or Rama’s Bridge, connecting India and Sri Lanka (see: Ram Setu: Ape Engineer Builds a Bridge over the Sea).
Looking for a natural cause
For many centuries, scientists have studied the Eye of the Sahara as a geological structure. It was first believed that its circular shape had been caused by a meteorite impact (Ettington 2018:31; Kosmiczne […] 2019). However, the more closely the Eye of the Sahara was studied, the more the structure became a mystery (Ettington 2018:31-32; Kosmiczne […] 2019). An object (a meteorite) rushing at tens of thousands of kilometres per hour into the atmosphere and then hitting the planet leaves behind many elements that appear on the hit surface of the Earth (Kosmiczne […] 2019). These elements are missing in the case of Richât; for example, there is no trace of a characteristic central elevation, rocks affected by temperature and pressure, and damage around the alleged crater (Ibid.). The possibility of creating a structure by volcanic eruptions also seems unlikely, as it again lacks an eruptive cone and, above all, volcanic rocks (Ibid.).
When a theory of an extra-terrestrial impact deformation was rejected, a closer study of the structure in the 1960s showed that it had been rather an effect of terrestrial processes, namely of a laccolithic thrust (Ettington 2018:31-32). Such an explanation was first considered and proposed by Richard-Molard in 1948 and it is also current today (Ettington 2018:31-32); the layered sedimentary rocks of the Eye of the Sahara are considered by geologists to be the final product of erosion that shaped the raised rock (Kosmiczne […] 2019). According to this theory, the process of formation of the Eye of the Sahara began when the giant super-continent Pangea that existed during the late Palaeozoic and early Mesozoic eras was disintegrating (Ibid.). It assembled from earlier continental units approximately 335 million years ago, and it began to break apart about 175 million years ago (Ibid.). The area of today’s Western Sahara was then subjected to rapid seismic changes (Ibid.). From the deeper regions up, a huge drop of magma began to pierce the rock underneath (Ibid.). On the way, it melted and pushed the rocks without breaking into the surface (Ibid.). Such processes created something like an underground dome of rock (Ibid.). About 100 million years ago, there was a huge eruption and the dome partially collapsed (Ibid.). Since then, erosion has exposed successive layers of compressed rock, creating what today looks so majestic and mysterious (Ibid.). This is the most likely explanation for the Eye of the Sahara phenomenon (Ibid.), however, it is not fully understood even today (Ettington 2018:32).
Geology or the supernatural?
According to Plato, it was the god Poseidon who had created the circular formation. Geologists have been looking for purely scientific explanations for the existence of the structure in Africa, such as natural terrestrial (or extra-terrestrial) processes. Some researchers of Atlantis have reached a compromise suggesting that the Atlanteans must have adopted the natural, geological structure for their own use (Kosmiczne […] 2019). Who would believe in Greek gods as the driving force lying behind such a formation? Nevertheless, the Richat’s astonishing symmetry makes it look like a nearly man-made structure (Alexander, Rosen 2011).
Naturally, the peculiar appearance of the Eye of the Sahara could not be unnoticed and was eventually linked to Atlantis (Kosmiczne […] 2019). With the twenty-first century, the mentioned researchers, George Alexander and Natalis Rosen (2011) studied the structure and compellingly decided that it closely resembles the description of Plato’s Atlantis (Kosmiczne […] 2019). Other propagators of the theory also reached similar conclusions (Ibid.).
In the self-recorded documentary Visiting Atlantis. Gateway to a lost world (2011), the couple of researchers mentioned many similarities between Atlantis and structure in the Sahara (Kosmiczne […] 2019). The first and perhaps the key argument for the Eye of the Sahara as Atlantis refers to the appearance of the formation in Africa (Ibid.). Analyzing the appearance of this structure, it is easy to conclude that it is very similar to the description of the legendary city (Ibid.).
“Looking towards the sea, but in the centre of the whole island, there was a plain which is said to have been the fairest of all plains and very fertile. Near the plain again, and also in the centre of the island at a distance of about fifty stadia, there was a mountain not very high on any side. [Breaking] the ground, [Poseidon] inclosed the hill […], making alternate zones of sea and land larger and smaller, encircling one another; there were two of land and three of water, which he turned as with a lathe, each having its circumference equidistant every way from the centre, so that no man could get to the island, for ships and voyages were not as yet”.Plato, Critias
Comparing this description to the appearance of the Eye of the Sahara, the similarity is striking (Kosmiczne […] 2019). Richât also consists of the central part of land and of concentric circles around it. (Ibid.). If the reconstructive appearance of Atlantis is compared to the Eye of the Sahara, they both look very similar (Ibid.). Plato describes two rings of land, between which there were three deeper rings filled with water (Ibid.). Exactly the same number of rings is seen in the grey and brown Eye of the Sahara: apart from its center, there are two brown circular ramps or shafts visibly protruding out of the surface, and three deeper circles lying alternately with those of the land (Ibid.). That part looks like a separate entity. Far beyond the center, aerial photographs also show the outlines of blue-like demi-circles of salty sediments, visible just from the east (“Richat structure” 2020). As such, the Eye of the Sahara is a very large structure (Kosmiczne […] 2019). Google Map shows that it measures approximately 40 kilometres in diameter (Ibid.).
Dimensions of the legend found on Earth
The question of the size of Atlantis is a very interesting matter (Kosmiczne […] 2019). Plato’s description shows that the concentric island with land and water levels measured 127 stadiums in diameter (Ibid.). However, the exact measurement of the stadium in relation to kilometres is problematic to establish (Ibid.). This unit had different dimensions in the ancient world (Ibid.). The difference could be as much as 20 meters, which would badly influence the final result of calculations (Ibid.).
The author of the Bright Insight channel, Jimmy, has used the stadium size used in Plato’s Athens, where 1 stadium is 185 meters, so 127 stadiums equal to 23,495 kilometres respectively (Kosmiczne […] 2019). When these dimensions are applied to the whole formation of the Eye of the Sahara, the entire structure is greater of about 16,5 kilometres in diameter (Ibid.). Nonetheless, researchers in favour of the thesis indicate that only the central unit of the concentric portion with the three levels of land and two deeper levels between them should be measured (Ibid.). The same number of levels is also given by Plato in his records of Atlantis, and his measurements given describe exactly such a structure (Ettington 2018:35). And if the width of the five successive rings of the Eye of Africa is measured, the obtained result ranges from 22 to 24 kilometres (Ibid.). Consequently, by using the Athenian unit of the stadium, the dimension of the Eye of the Sahara coincides with the description of Plato (Ibid.). Moreover, the use of most of the stadium units applied in ancient Greece gives a result within the same limit (Ibid.). Such a similarity is highly puzzling (Kosmiczne […] 2019).
To the north and south of Atlantis
“The whole country was said by [Solon] to be very lofty and precipitous on the side of the sea, but the country immediately about and surrounding the city was a level plain, itself surrounded by mountains which descended towards the sea; it was smooth and even, and of an oblong shape, extending in one direction three thousand stadia, but across the centre inland it was two thousand stadia. This part of the island looked towards the south, and was sheltered from the north. The surrounding mountains were celebrated for their number and size and beauty, far beyond any which still exist, having in them also many wealthy villages of country folk, and rivers, and lakes, and meadows supplying food enough for every animal, wild or tame, and much wood of various sorts, abundant for each and every kind of work”.Plato, Critias
Accordingly, the entrance or exit of the capital city of Atlantis was to the south, as it is in the case of the Eye of Africa, with its plain and almost deserted terrain descending towards the south (Ettington 2018:35).
Whereas, to the north, the range of mountains surrounded Atlantis and shielded the city from the north winds (Ettington 2018:35; Kosmiczne […] 2019). Likewise, in the north of the Eye of the Sahara there are mountains (Ettington 2018:35; Kosmiczne […] 2019). Actually, they look quite impressive and, what is more, there are the riverbeds of ancient rivers, which are also mentioned by Plato (Ettington 2018:35; Kosmiczne […] 2019). This is therefore another argument in favour of the theory that the Eye of the Sahara may be the real location of the legendary Atlantis (Ibid.).
Fresh water in salty ocean of sand
“[Poseidon] himself, being a god, found no difficulty in making special arrangements for the centre island, bringing up two springs of water from beneath the earth, one of warm water and the other of cold, and making every variety of food to spring up abundantly from the soil.”Plato, Critias
“In the next place, they had fountains, one of cold and another of hot water, in gracious plenty flowing; and they were wonderfully adapted for use by reason of the pleasantness and excellence of their waters. They constructed buildings about them and planted suitable trees, also they made cisterns, some open to the heavens, others roofed over, to be used in winter as warm baths; there were the kings’ baths, and the baths of private persons, which were kept apart; and there were separate baths for women, and for horses and cattle, and to each of them they gave as much adornment as was suitable. Of the water which ran off they carried some to the grove of Poseidon, where were growing all manner of trees of wonderful height and beauty, owing to the excellence of the soil, while the remainder was conveyed by aqueducts along the bridges to the outer circles”.Plato, Critias
The authors of the documentary (Alexander, Rosen 2011) point out that the region of Richat is full of salt and wells producing just salt water, but in the central part of the structure there is one spring with fresh water (Kosmiczne […] 2019). Local inhabitants use this source for their everyday needs (Ibid.). Therefore, there is once again a surprising correlation to the description of Plato, where the author reports the presence of the source of water in the central part of the city (Ibid.) But such surprising links between the Plato’s story and the structure of Richat also appear in many other aspects.
For a continuation, see Looking in the Eye of Horus.
Featured image: Satellite picture of the Richat Structure (false colour). Photo by NASA/GSFC/MITI/ERSDAC/JAROS, and U.S./Japan ASTER Science Team (2000). Public domain. Photo source: “Richat structure” (2020). In: Wikipedia. The Free Encyclopedia.
Faculties of English Philology, History of Art and Archaeology.
University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland;
Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland;
University College Dublin, Ireland.
“Critias (dialogue)” (2020). Wikipedia. The Free Encyclopedia. Available at <https://bit.ly/348NW7u>. [Accessed on 14th December, 2020].
“Richat Structure” (2020). Wikipedia. The Free Encyclopedia. Available at <https://bit.ly/3qTYH7n>. [Accessed on 14th December, 2020].
“Timaeus (dialogue)” (2020). Wikipedia. The Free Encyclopedia. Available at <https://bit.ly/2Wh5qdq>. [Accessed on 14th December, 2020].
Alexander S. G., Rosen N. (2011) Visiting Atlantis. Gate to a lost world. Wilddoor Production.
Alexander S. G., Rosen N. (2011). “Archaeology”. In: Visiting Atlantis. Gate to a lost world (2011). Available at <https://bit.ly/3nCXHCO>. [Accessed on 19th December, 2020].
Alexander S. G., Rosen N. (2011). “Gallery 11 and 17”. In: Visiting Atlantis. Gate to a lost world (2011). Available at <https://bit.ly/3nCXHCO>. [Accessed on 19th December, 2020].
Alexander, G. S (2018). “George S. Alexander answers FAQ”. In: Visiting Atlantis. Available at <https://bit.ly/2IUg9Ys>. [Accessed on 14th December, 2020].
Current World Archaeology (2009). “Sais”. Extract from a full article. Issue 36, Egypt, Features. In: Current World Archaeology. Available at <http://bit.ly/2JVGlT5>. [Accessed on 15th December, 2020].
Ettington M. K. (2018) The Real Atlantis – In the Eye of the Sahara. Lightening Source UK Ltd.
Hancock G. (2020) ”Graham Hancock Explains the Mysteries of Atlantis and Göbekli Tepe”. In: FightMediocrity. Available at <https://bit.ly/37khfG7>. [Accessed on 15th December, 2020].
Image by Jimmy (2018). In: “Bright Insight”. Photo source: Kettley S. (2018). “Atlantis FOUND? Conspiracist convinced THIS PHOTO proves location of lost city of Atlantis”. In: Express.co.uk. . Available at <http://bit.ly/2KFFbL8>. [Accessed on 18th December, 2020].
Kosmiczne opowieści (2019) ”Atlantyda Odkryta w Oku Sahary?”. In: Kosmiczne opowieści. Available at <https://bit.ly/3qRrI3C>. [Accessed on 13th December, 2020].
Photo by Alejandro BGN (2019). Photo source: Google Maps (2020). Available at <http://bit.ly/3rbIpqD>. [Accessed on 18th December, 2020].
Photo by Athanasius Kircher (1664). Public domain. Photo source: “Atlantis” (2020). In: Wikipedia. The Free Encyclopedia. Available at <http://bit.ly/3pc9Mzf>. [Accessed on 18th December, 2020].
Photo by Henri Estienne (1578). Public domain. Photo source: “Plato” (2020). Wikipedia. The Free Encyclopedia. Available at <http://bit.ly/3r86grb>. [Accessed on 18th December, 2020].
Photo by Ignatius Donnelly (1882); cropped by Beyond My Ken (talk) (2010) (This image is available from the United States Library of Congress’s Prints and Photographs division. Public domain. Photo source: “Atlantis” (2020). In: Wikipedia. The Free Encyclopedia. Available at <http://bit.ly/3p6miQF>. [Accessed on 18th December, 2020].
Photo by Lepsius Projekt (2011). Public domain. Photo source: “Sais, Egypt” (2020). In: Wikipedia. The Free Encyclopedia. Available at <http://bit.ly/3aoJeq8>. [Accessed on 18th December, 2020].
Photo by NASA/JPL/NIMA (2004). Public domain. Photo source: “Richat structure” (2020). In: Wikipedia. The Free Encyclopedia. Available at <http://bit.ly/3nxnKv9>. [Accessed on 18th December, 2020].
Photo taken by a member of the Expedition 30 crew (2011). Photo source: “Richat structure” (2011). In: NASA Earth Observatory. Available at <http://go.nasa.gov/37yIQmY>. [Accessed on 18th December, 2020].
Photo: A detail of The School of Athens, a fresco by Raphael (1509–1511). Public domain. Photo source: “Plato” (2020). Wikipedia. The Free Encyclopedia. Available at <http://bit.ly/3gZoKFI>. [Accessed on 18th December, 2020].
Plato “Critias”. Benjamin Jowett (1994) trans. into English. In: The Internet Classics Archives. Available at <https://bit.ly/37pQuAi>. [Accessed on 17th December, 2020].
Plato “Timaeus”. Benjamin Jowett (2008-2009) trans. into English. In: The Project Gutenberg E-Book of Timaeus by Plato. Available at <http://bit.ly/3r4zR4Q>. [Accessed on 17th December, 2020].
WikiImages (2011). Free images at Pixabay. Available at <https://bit.ly/2K9ueBZ>. [Accessed on 19th December, 2020].
10 thoughts on “Sunk Island in the Sahara Desert”
Very interesting! Finally, someone took it seriously. I found many traces of buildings, unnatural straight lines, big squares, dams, and possible old human inhabitation using Google Earth – not only within the richat structure but in the surrounding area. I hope some soon day qualified scientists start to examine the whole area with drones and dig for fundaments and caves.
Thank you for your interest in my article and your comment. I agree the Richat structure is very promising in terms of archaeological excavations. As an archaeologist I am very interested in the subject but I cannot do anything more than disseminating the idea, as much as other enthusiasts do. I also understand that the site needs to be properly researched, including archaeological excavations. Nevertheless, such a theory needs someone with a fortune and great archaeological passion, like someday Heinrich Schliemann, who would be able to undertake such a project. I wish I could take part in it… Hopefully, it will someday happen.
Many thanks for this well-written and extensive article. I found it a great read and the presented hypothesis seems very promising. It would be highly interesting to see excavations being done in the Eye.
What do you think about the idea that Atlantis was located in the Mediterranean, with Santorini as it’s capital? There seems to be a submerged platform around the small islands, and with freshwater pouring in from Lake Agassiz, it might just have gone down. Many other signs fit that location as well.
Thank you very much for your pleasant comment. I am very happy the article turned out to be informative and interesting. When it comes to the location of Atlantis in the Mediterranean, with its center on Thera island, finally destroyed by its volcanic eruption, I have written two other articles you may like to read: “When gods turned against the Minoans” https://archaeotravel.eu/when-gods-turned-against-the-minoans/ and “Disaster of the Bronze Age spreads beyond the epicenter” https://archaeotravel.eu/disaster-of-the-bronze-age-spreads-beyond-the-epicenter/
In short, I think that there are many aspects in favour of situating the legendary capital of Atlantis in the Aegean, especially due to the fact of a sophisticated culture the Minoans created. On the other side, there are some crucial discrepancies between Plato’s records and the homeland of the Minoans of the Bronze Age. First of all, the time does not match. Moreover, artifacts referring to the cult of bulls appear mainly on Crete and not on Thera itself, which would suggest that Crete was the headquarters, while Thera was either a Minoan colony or the island heavily influenced by the culture. In general, I would say that the Minoans of the Bronze Age would have more likely preserved the fragments of the Atlantean culture than they were the Atlanteans themselves. For further information, please refer to my articles.
I can also recommend you the book by Gavin Menzies “The Lost Empire of Atlantis” (2011). The author is inclined to locate the capital of Atlantis on Thera, while he places its colonies not only in the Mediterranean but also in North America.
Finally, when it comes to Lake Agassiz the catastrophe happened 8,200 years ago so if it affected the Mediterranean it was around 6 200 BC., long before the Minoan culture developed. What is more, according to Plato, the destruction of Atlantis happened much earlier. Postulated reasons of the final destruction of Atlantis are as many as their potential locations. I think it was the biblical Great Flood, including water reservoirs pouring into oceans, which eventually destroyed it but what had directly caused the flood is still a mystery.
Anyway, it seems that facts are more interesting than fiction 😊
Apologies, I have failed intermittently to find your page, and could not reply. I have bookmarked it now.
First of all, thank you for your additional explanations. I believe you have made it clear that the location of Atlantis in the Aegean is unlikely, unless grave mistakes have been made regarding the timelines. Also, of course your point with the artifacts as well is very convincing.
Colonies in North America sound interesting; I am aware of another map where Atlantis is drawn as a large island in between the continents of Africa and South America. However, I am unsure whether such a large land mass could truly just vanish. You must have explored that theory as well? Apologies if you have discussed this in your other articles, which I will read shortly as soon as I find the time. I really appreciate your style of writing – very scientific and detailed, while still easy to understand. I also envy your ability to flawlessly weave pictures into text. Your passion for these topics certainly shows in your articles.
Thank you again,
I truly appreciate your message and interest in my articles.
I am sorry for delay in responding but I have just come back to full time job and additionally, I prepare myself for a PhD project.
Thank you for your positive opinions about my style of writing. Yes, I am very passionate about archaeology and about its more controversial aspects, such as the subject of Atlantis.
When it comes to inscribing the lost continent into America, the subject has also been explored by Jim Allen, in his book “Atlantis: Lost Kingdom of the Andes” (2009). There is too a documentary of the same title. The author places Atlantis in high mountains of Bolivia and Peru with the city of Tiwanaku by the Lake of Titicaca as its capital. It is also believed the city was built by the god Viracocha, by means of an army of giants (Discovery Channel UK; Expedition Unknown – Atlantis Of The Andes). I agree that the city must be much older that it is thought but I am not sure if Atlantis was located just there. In my opinion, it is important to archaeologically explore first the area of the Eye of Africa to reject or accept this site as a proposed location of Atlantis. Nevertheless, it will not happen till the subject is treated seriously by authorities. The same problem concerns the age and origins of Tiwanaku or Puma Punku in Bolivia.
Hopefully, the matter of Atlantis and other aspects of the so-called ‘forbidden archaeology’ will be under further debate.
I will try to find time to study the subject more (possibly after some expeditions) and so I will be ready to write some new articles on it.
Meantime, I encourage you to read my present content if it is of your interest.
My best regards,
I appreciate your reply. Interesting, I will look into the city of Tiwanaku, of which I have never heard. I am shocked as to how many questions in archaeology have not been solved and remain open for discussion, when it should be comparably easy to settle them. Time and time again I realize how little the historical understanding of our race has developed, in comparison to physics or chemistry. Indeed I do not understand why any part of archaeology should be “forbidden” – as the knights of King Arthur have began their search for the Holy Grail at the darkest places, so too should archaeology consider the most unlikely cases.
I wish you all the best and good luck with your PhD project. If the field work does not lead to enough publications, you should consider compiling a review. Maybe on forbidden archaeology that was finally found to be correct, and stirred the mainstream narrative. Göbekli Tepe is also an interesting subject in that regard. Nobody saw that one coming. And writing a review would probably be easy for you. That is, if such a thing is even possible in your field. Funny enough, I did find one scientific review that seems to suggest Atlantis was in Andalusia. It’s called ATLANTIS IN SPAIN VI, DOI: 10.12681/bgsg11169
As I have just recently finished a PhD project myself, I can only say that it is a lot of work, and I’m afraid we won’t be hearing from you for a while.
Thank you for the comment. Nice to hear from you again.
Yes, you are right. PhD involves a lots of engagement and time, especially when one needs to work full-time. Hopefully, I will survive.
Thank you for sharing your advice with me. I love writing but research itself is time-consuming and what I need is exactly more time.
I have just published online the second part of an article dedicated to another site of the Apollo/St Michael Axis located on Rhodes. Hopefully, you would like it.
Congratulation on your completed PhD project! The more I appreciate your positive opinion on my writings.
All the best,
Great article! I love the idea of Atlantis and the Richat Structure. Eye of the Sahara has always look interesting to me but now I am confident Atlantis is a Richer Structure!
Thank you for your comment and interest in my article.
I also think that it is probable but we still need archaeological evidence in this case.
Happy New Year!